Multi-market data quality: where cross-country comparisons go wrong
Differences between markets in a multi-country study are part finding and part artefact. Separating them is a design problem, not an analysis problem.
Read moreResearch Insights · 12 August 2026 · 7 min read
Incidence assumptions carried over from consumer research are the usual reason a B2B study runs over. Here is what the field data actually shows.

B2B fieldwork is priced on incidence and delivered on patience. The gap between the two is where most project overruns live, and it is almost always an incidence assumption imported from a study with a much broader audience.
Across our B2B work, moving a target from manager level to director level typically halves achievable incidence, and moving from director to C-suite halves it again. Sector and company size matter, but neither moves the number the way seniority does.
The practical consequence is that a brief which loosens seniority by one level often costs less than half as much and fields in a third of the time. That trade is worth putting in front of the end client explicitly.
The cost of verifying a senior respondent does not scale linearly with how rare they are. Each additional verification stage adds analyst time on every candidate, including the ones who are rejected, so the effective cost per accepted complete rises steeply at the top of the seniority range.
Build the field window around the last ten percent rather than the first ninety, read the funnel on day one, and agree in advance what happens if a cell will not fill — a longer field window, a relaxed definition or a reduced target. Deciding that under time pressure mid-field rarely produces the best answer.
Keep reading
Differences between markets in a multi-country study are part finding and part artefact. Separating them is a design problem, not an analysis problem.
Read moreReaching clinicians has not become harder. Proving that you reached the clinician you think you did has.
Read moreSingle-source sample is easier to manage and steadily less representative. Blending is harder and better, provided the blend is reported.
Read moreFeasibility, incidence and costs within one working day — including the markets where your target, as written, is not achievable.